Talk:Middle English

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Middle English article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

Languages Mid‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Mid‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

English Language Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Language, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the English language on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.English LanguageWikipedia:WikiProject English LanguageTemplate:WikiProject English LanguageEnglish Language
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

European history Mid‑importance

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

50,000

Yryfhrvgdvt high tg 203.144.93.85 (talk) 01:08, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Middle English didn't exist.

Middle English didn't exist. Anglo-Saxon did NOT evolve into Modern English. People erroneously refer to Anglo-Saxon as "Old English". Understanding the enormous differences between Anglo-Saxon and English, an artificial construct called "Middle English" was hypothesized in the 19th century, the "missing link". But, until the 1150s, Anglo-Saxons wrote in Anglo-Saxon, which didn't change much between Horsa and the time of King Stephen. And, spelling aside, English is not significantly different between the time of Chaucer and today. So, between mid-12th(last written Anglo-Saxon) and mid-14th(first written English) we have 200 years where the Norman Elite of England wrote in Latin or French. Somehow, unwritten, the Anglo-Saxon morphed into English, with no direct evidence for this. And, it did it to the point where the 14th century English bears no resemblance to the 12th century Anglo-Saxon. Even if this actually happened, then the "Middle English" of c 1200 would have to be enormously different to the "Middle English" of c 1300. 197.87.143.164 (talk) 13:59, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Strange that all WP:RS think differently! Johnbod (talk) 15:09, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not in the slightest. All RS will claim that Oswald was the Lone Gunman, or that the Wright Brothers invented the aeroplane, when neither is true.

What has happened is first a skeletal belief has been laid out, without actual evidence. Then, once the basic structure is in place, everything must be made(or distorted) to fit the accepted(and still unproven) structure. So, the structure says that

A) Anglo-Saxon is Old English B) Modern English is an evolved form of Anglo-Saxon. Neither A nor B has proof. Both are taken as "established fact", when nothing has actually been established.

Next, the written Anglo-Saxon of the 5th century is identical to the written Anglo-Saxon of the 12th century. And, the written Modern English is, spelling aside, identical to the Modern English of right now. There is no written Anglo-Saxon or English in 13th century. So, in order to make A and B true, there was an unwritten Middle English, spoken from 12th through 14th centuries, the Missing Link of English. And thus our historical construct is real. Hurrah! And, we don't need any actual written Middle English, because everyone knows the Normans wrote in French or Latin. If Anglo-Saxon is an earlier form of Modern English(and our textbooks say that it is!) than there must have been this Middle English. No Middle English would mean that English does NOT come from Anglo-Saxon, and that may mean that other things about accepted British History may be incorrect. And nobody is going to go there... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.87.143.164 (talk) 06:09, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Third Letter of the English Alphabet

In Old English, the third letter was probably called “chee.” Does anyone know how “chee” became “cee”? Cbsteffen (talk) 04:45, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IIRC, in the ME period ⟨c⟩ was more or less reassigned from /tʃ/ (the "ch sound") to /ts/, which mirrors changes in orthographic Norms (ha!) taking place in French at that same time. During the 13th century, this /ts/ sound got de-affricated to just /s/; this sound shift likewise affected both languages. Remsense ‥ 诉 06:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Poor grammar, unclear meaning

Not quite sure what this means, besides being ungrammatical (3rd graf under “History, - Transition from Old English,” last sentence :

“This dramatic changes that happened on English contributes with the acceptance of the hypothesis that Old Norse had a more profound impact on Middle and Modern English development than any other language.”.^[1]^[2]^[3] Lawrence Kootnikoff (talk) 05:33, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

^ Crystal, David (1995). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-521-40179-1.
^ McCrum, Robert (1987). The Story of English. London: Faber and Faber. pp. 70–71.
^ Birth of a Language. BBC. 27 December 2014. Event occurs at 35:00–37:20 – via YouTube.

[1] Crystal, David (1995). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. Cambridge University Press. p. 32. ISBN 978-0-521-40179-1.

[:1-2] McCrum, Robert (1987). The Story of English. London: Faber and Faber. pp. 70–71.

[3] Birth of a Language. BBC. 27 December 2014. Event occurs at 35:00–37:20 – via YouTube.

[1]

[2]

[3]